Executive summary
The SAT® journey feels like a rollercoaster for many students. August 2025 brought waves of disappointment as students questioned why their hard work did not translate into higher scores. September 2025, on the other hand, was marked by anxious anticipation, speculation about scoring curves, and obsessive debates over tricky questions. Meanwhile, the College Board insists its “equating” process ensures fairness across test dates. The reality is that students experience equating as randomness, which fuels stress and mistrust. Parents and students alike need clarity, reassurance, and strategies to move past this frustration. Sherpal is positioned to provide exactly that. Turning confusion into confidence and focusing attention on skill growth rather than curve luck.
1. Insights from Reddit on the August 23 SAT®
Emotional Landscape: Students reported deep disappointment, often describing feelings of wasted effort after months of preparation. Words like “stupid,” “disappointed,” and “hopeless” were common.
Score Discrepancies:
- Many saw drops of 100+ points compared to practice exams.
- Reading/Writing was widely considered tougher than usual, while Math scores were steadier.
- Students with consistent 1550+ on College Board mocks ended up near 1400 on the official test.
Themes:
- Confusion about why practice performance did not carry over.
- Stress about retakes with college application deadlines looming.
- Distrust of prep resources and practice test predictiveness.
Community dynamic: The Conversation was heavy with venting and shared misery. Students leaned on each other for empathy rather than strategies.
2. Insights from Reddit on the September 13 SAT®
Emotional Landscape: Unlike August’s retrospective disappointment, September threads buzzed with anticipation, speculation, and anxious waiting.
Score Release Anxiety:
- Students stayed up late refreshing their portals, desperate for results.
- First-time test takers in particular expressed intense stress.
Curve & Prediction Obsession:
- Threads were filled with students tallying wrong answers and asking peers to predict scores: “If I missed one in module 2, can I still get an 800?”
- Unusual questions like the “daylight quadratic” or “cross-text with Xian and He” dominated discussions.
- Many speculated whether these items were experimental and how they would affect scaling.
Study Habits:
- More emphasis on sleep, structure, and consistency than on resources.
- Students encouraged one another to find weak spots and target them systematically with a structured SAT® study plan
3. Comparing August and September
Key Differences
- August: Students were processing results they did not expect and struggling with whether to retake. The emotional tone was disappointment and exhaustion.
- September: Students were focused on what their scores might be, stressing over equating and curve predictions. The emotional tone was nervous energy and speculation.
Key Similarities
Both groups:
- Noted a gap between practice test performance and actual scores.
- Expressed high anxiety about outcomes.
- Saw small variances (10–30 points) as major and potentially life-changing.
- Looked to peers for reassurance and advice.
4. How the College Board "Tries" to Make it Fair: Equating
What Equating Means: The College Board uses equating to make sure a score earned on one test date is equivalent to the same score on another.
How It Plays Out:
- On one test, missing six questions might equal a 700.
- On another, missing eight might still equal that same 700.
- Sometimes one mistake drops a score 10 points, other times 20.
Why It Exists: Tests vary slightly in difficulty, and equating smooths this out so colleges can fairly compare scores from different months.
What It Is Not: It is not a curve. Your score is not based on how others perform.
Where Tension Lies: While equating is meant to promote fairness, students feel it as unfair swings. For a student chasing 1500+, a 20-point drop feels anything but minor.
5. The So What
- Students interpret equating as randomness and unfairness. They feel powerless, even when the shifts are statistically small.
- Parents struggle to separate true underperformance from statistical adjustment, leading to doubt and second-guessing.
- The College Board has created a system that works mathematically but fails to connect emotionally with the people taking it.